French flagpolish flagspanish flag

Terrorism & Revolutions Subtopics

Can Barack Obama save America?

Written by Alain Pilote on Sunday, 01 February 2009. Posted in Terrorism & Revolutions

Barack Hussein ObamaOn January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama became the first African-American president in U.S. history, bringing along with him a lot of high expectations. Has he not run his campaign under the theme of hope and change ("Change you can believe in!") In fact, there has been real Obama Mania created by the news media, many calling him the new "Messiah" or "Savior" for America. Can Obama really save America?

Make no mistake, there will be no change under Obama. (Unless a miracle happens, similar to the conversion of St. Paul, or the awakening of the population on the money issue.) Obama controls nothing and is merely a front man of the financial elite for our enslavement. His administration will continue the bankers’ plan to meltdown the economy, move toward a one-world currency system, and allow the bankers to continue their unprecedented centralization of power.

The five last U.S. presidents
The five last U.S. presidents (from left to right: George Bush Sr.,
Barack Obama, George Bush Jr., Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter),
all controlled by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations).

In fact, there was actually no real choice at the last U.S. elections, the two main presidential candidates having virtually the same platform (except for abortion, as McCain claimed to be pro-life). As someone rightly wrote: "Obama is Coca-Cola and McCain is Pepsi – at the end of the day you’re still drinking the same beverage." Presidential candidates are not elected, they are "selected." Democrat and Republican presidential candidates are the two hands of the same body, headed by the world financial elite.

On the abortion issue, Obama is the most anti-life U.S. President in history. One of his first decisions as President was to reverse federal-level pro-life policies by executive order, such as the federal ban on funding for overseas abortion providers. In the long term, he has vowed his support for contraception and unlimited abortion via the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would wipe-out all legal protections of the unborn including the partial-birth abortion ban. (See article page 13.) What is also unfortunate is that a majority of U.S. Catholics voted for him despite his pro-abortion stand. (See comments of Fr. Corapi on page 7.)

In an article entitled Behind the Obama Agenda, John F. McManus wrote in the Dec. 8, 2008 issue of The New American: "The team Barack Obama has begun assembling suggests that, in terms of substance, the incoming administration may not be that different from the outgoing…

"Even though Barack Obama has avoided using the term, his plans for our country fit nicely into what has long been known as the new world order, a phrase employed in recent decades by Richard Nixon, Nelson Rockefeller, Fidel Castro, Mikhail Gorbachev, George H.W. Bush, and many others. None of the proponents of such an "order" have ever fully explained its meaning or noted its origin. However, a few have come fairly close to doing so. Perhaps the one who has come closest is Zbigniew Brzezinski, arguably President-elect Obama’s most important adviser.

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Zbigniew Brzezinski (right), adviser to President Jimmy Carter, founding director (along with David Rockefeller) of the Trilateral Commission, and advocate of world government, is top Obama adviser.

"We can be quite sure that somewhere between 400 to 500 high-level members of the Obama administration will be members of the CFR. How can we say that? Because that’s about how many CFR members occupy the current Bush administration. And about the same number occupied posts in the Clinton administration. And so it has gone since the New Deal reign of Franklin D. Roosevelt."

David Rockefeller famously said at a 1991 meeting of the Bilderberg Group: "The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." No one needs conspiracy theories when the perpetrators are this blatant.

According to Mr. Webster Tarpley, in his book Obama, The Postmodern Coup, The Making of a Manchurian Candidate, Obama was recruited over 25 years ago by Zbigniew Brzezinski, as a student at Columbia University, to be groomed as the president to succeed George W. Bush in 2008. In 1970, Brzezinsky had recruited Jimmy Carter, the then unknown governor of Georgia, to be President in 1976, and foster the plans of the one-worlders; Obama is now his latest recruit for the completion of this plan for a world government.

Danger for World War III

Obama will not reduce the military, he will send more soldiers to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and even other nations. According to Tarpley, Brzezinsky’s objective is to have China and Russia eliminate each other in a war: "Brzezinsky looks at the neocons and he says to the neocons: ‘You bunglers. We gave you the clash of civilizations as an idea,’ and he says: ‘What you should have done is to play these different countries one against the other. The essence of imperialism is you don’t attack Iraq, you play Iran against Iraq. You don’t attack Venezuela, you play Colombia against Venezuela. You don’t attack Somalia, you play Ethiopia against Somalia.’ ‘And ultimately you don’t attack Russia‘ he says, ‘You play China against Russia, or some variation of that.’

"But now the heart of the Brzezinsky strategy is this. Brzezinsky looks at China. And he says: ‘China can be manipulated through their raw material and oil dependency on Africa, and in particular Sudan. We know that now Sudan is supplying 7, 8% maybe of China ‘s oil needs, petroleum, in general. Brzezinsky would say: ‘What you have to do first of all is kick the Chinese out of Africa… And then you bomb and destroy Pakistan, because Pakistan is a traditional ally of China, an important economic partner of China.

"Now, the endgame is the following. Once you have stripped China of all of its allies, cut off their supply of oil and raw materials, destroyed any economic partners that they have, you’ve got China isolated. At that point the U.S. will essentially say to China: ‘If you want oil, you go get it in Eastern Siberia.’ In other words: To force the Chinese under a weakened government to try to look for oil and raw materials on Russian territory.

"The oil wells of Eastern Siberia are of course there – they are very significant. There are very few Russians, lots and lots of oil, lots and lots of minerals. And that is Brzezinski’s strategy.

"Now, I would point out, this is pure insanity. This goes back to what the British did with Hitler. In the 1930’s, the British basically said: ‘Well, we have Hitler. Let’s play Hitler against Stalin, let’s play Germany against Russia and destroy both of them that way.’ Traditional imperialism. The problem is that this thing is going to blow up in Brzezinski’s face because both Moscow and Beijing know exactly what Brzezinski is doing."

On the economic issue, Obama has surrounded himself with the same CFR people who worked under previous U.S. administrations, to lead us to total bankruptcy, and they offer no solution to help families and consumers; their only solution is to have the poor bail out the super wealthy, and get the country deeper into debt. As Michel Chossudovsky wrote: "We are dealing with an absurd circular relationship: To finance the bailout, Washington must borrow from the banks, which are the recipients of the bailout. The U.S. administration is financing its own indebtedness."

Obama and the statue of Lincoln

Obama in front of the statue of Abraham Lincoln

Obama said that one of his idols is U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, who in the 1860’s put an end to black slavery in the U.S.A. Lincoln is also the president who issued the Greenbacks, debt-free money, instead of borrowing the same money at interest from private bankers. This is an example we strongly urge Obama to follow. And then, Obama could also apply the other principles of Social Credit, like the compensated price and the monthly dividend to every citizen of the nation. This is the only way to save America.

Barack Obama is a man of consummate skill and incisive intelligence. (His name "Barack," in Arabic and Swahili, means "blessed.") He can become a great President, or he can become a toady for the corporate powers that have brought both parties to their knees. Will Obama be the servant of Wall Street or Main Street, the servant of the bankers or of ordinary people? Obama has much to offer. But he needs prayer... for when one considers who advises and surrounds him, it would take a real miracle for him to buck the system and stand for the ordinary people.

Let us pray for the new President

Michael Brown of wrote: In Christian love, the Pope congratulated Barack Obama, as did the U.S. bishops. Graciousness always has its place. So – above all – does prayer. We note the brilliance of how Rome issued a statement asking Catholics to ‘pray that God may enlighten’ the new president. It is a prayer that could be requested of any leader but also could be interpreted (strongly) as a request for prayer that Obama soften his astonishingly strong support for abortion.

In his inaugural address, Obama said many interesting things. What if they were not only pretty words to lure people, but really mean something:

"Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some… On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics…. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished… a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart – not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good."

We know who are the greedy and irresponsible people: the international bankers. The dogma that states that only the debt-money borrowed at interest from private bankers is good, and not the money inssued interest-free by society, is a worn out dogma that should no longer be in use. The production capacity of the nation has not diminished, it is only the artificial money system that is defective and needs to be corrected. Our nation will be really rich if every citizen can benefit from the fruits of progress and natural resources, through a dividend (since we are all shareholders in the resources and inventions of our nation).

Can we change the system? Without prayer, and without the pressure of the people on their elected representatives, it is impossible. But with God’s grace, and the education of the people on this issue, yes we can!

About the Author

Alain Pilote

Alain Pilote

Alain Pilote has been the editor of the English edition of MICHAEL for several years. Twice a year we organize a week of study of the social doctrine of the Church and its application and Mr. Pilote is the instructor during these sessions.


Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest.

Your Cart

Latest Issue

Choose your topic

Newsletter & Magazine



Go to top
JSN Boot template designed by