A journal of Catholic patriots
for the Social Credit
monetary reform

French flagpolish flagspanish flag

facebookyoutubeGoogle+

Basic Income vs Universal Basic Income, vs a Social Dividend to All

Written by Robert Carré on Thursday, 09 March 2017. Posted in In This Age of Plenty (book)

In this age of plenty - Editor's Note

Basic Income is the talk of the day: 4.24 million entries on Google for “Basic Income” alone, another 439 000 for “Universal Basic Income” and 1.87 million entries for “Social Dividend”.

The basic income of the Ontario Basic Income Pilot Project, where basic income is adjusted to other sources of income, is a “means tested” basic income: An amount of money that will raise a citizen out of poverty, poverty being defined as 70% of the median worker’s salary. If the median wage is $33 000, than the poverty line is established at $23 000 for a citizen living alone.

In this case, the citizen who now has a yearly income of $18 000, would receive a supplement of $5 000 so that his basic income might reach a total of $23 000. Whatever the arguments in favor of or against basic income, the fact remains that Social Security and other types of fixed income do not, at present, suffice in keeping people out of poverty.

A Universal Basic Income, for its part, is a set amount of money sent to every citizen of a country whether they need it or not, whatever their age, whether they are employed or not, etc.

A Social Dividend is more than a basic income, more than a universal basic income. It is the realization that the greater part of production is now being made by machines. Natural resources are a gift of Nature. Technology is passed down from one generation to the next, it is a common good. The two must benefit every single citizen whether employed or not. Social dividends are a basic income “on steroids”, so to speak. Learn more on social dividends by reading: A Social Dividend to All.

Ontario’s Basic Income is a meager supplement of income provided by the Ontario Government, through taxes, ranging from $0 to $23 000 a year. Ontarians are entitled to much more.

If 60% of production is due to progress, as is the case today, than 60% of GDP per capita ought to be distributed in the form of dividends, financed debt-free by the Bank of Canada, by order of the Federal Government.

A basic income, as promoted by the Ontario Basic Income Pilot Project, does not reflect facts. There is a substantial deficit of purchasing power in Ontario: Total GDP of 750 billion dollars, with household incomes of 500 billion dollars. Based on these figures, the Ontario Government could issue some 250 billion dollars to its 14 million citizens: This amounts to $18 000 per person per year or $1 500 per person per month.

The question that remains to be answered is where will the Ontario Government get this much money? The answer to this question can be found in: A Sound and Efficient Financial System

About the Author